Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:43:35 EST
Myron & Horst,
The expression for the mass m of a fluid element of volume V should be V*rho, not (1/V)*rho.
The Navier-Stokes equations are “complete” and DO include all linear and angular terms. The reason they do not match experiment in some cases is that “turbulence” is “random” and has to be “modeled”; the same “model” does not describe all possible situations.
Also, The GENESIS Identity (that you have looked at), when applied to fluid dynamics, contains local or global “spin” in the curl term. This is usually called “vorticity”. The velocity induced by a vortex element involves (in 3-D) an inverse square VECTOR product with the radius (unit) vector. In contrast, the div term (compressibility) involves just the simple inverse square TIMES the radius (unit) vector.
Regards,
Barry
—- EMyrone] at [aol.com wrote: >
OK thanks – it would be interesting to relate your theorem to ECE.
