Subject: Severe International Criticism of Wikipedia
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:02:14 EDT
The amount of sustained high quality interest in ECE makes a pig’s breakfast of wikipedia’s plaintive claim that the ECE theory has “not been accepted”. With objectivity like that who needs blank prejudice. The wikipedia site on yours truly was written by obsolete standard modellers and was removed after a huge controversy. My career according to wikipedia was unrecognizable, even the British Civil List was censored because I happened to be on it. Because of this outrageous prejudice it became the most controversial wiki site in the world and was removed. It never generated a fraction of the interest of the two main ECE sites, _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and _www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com) . When it is time to do the returns again, I will just write: “bloody everywhere”. Only the University of Wales and “The Wstern Mail” are as bigotted as wiki when it comes to me, and for no understandable reason. Kerry Pendergast’s excellent biography and the forthcoming biographical film by Ken Russell is the British answer to wiki. The rest of the world rejects wiki too as if anyone didn’t know.
