Fwd: The End of the Standard Model : the End of Indeterminacy

by

 



Subject: The End of the Standard Model : the End of Indeterminacy
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:55:50 EDT

Dear Myron,

Please find below the latest page of the filmscript.

?
?
?
?
?
Both Vigier and Hart were champions of Einstein’s deterministic physics in the latter part of the twentieth century.?
Vigier linked up with Myron to write the series of books ‘The Enigmatic Photon’ and Professor John Hart teamed up with Myron to promote Einstein’s work through the Alpha Institute for Advanced Study which was formed in 1998.?
This link up gave Myron vital links back to Einstein, De Broglie and Dirac allowing him to receive insights into the nature of their work which would stimulate advances in theory which would ultimately lead to the Einstein-Cartan- Evans unified field theory in 2003. ?
?
?
?
?
One valuable insight was the revelation that Einstein was an ardent believer in photon mass.?
In the standard model, photon mass has been discounted from the time of the 1927 Solvay Conference in which theoretical physicists moved away from the deterministic physics of Einstein, De Broglie and Newton into an obtuse mathematical representation of the atomic world, which progressively moved further and further away from Baconian Science based on matching theories with experiment.?
Richard Feynman eloquently summed up the standard model of physics in the latter part of the twentieth century, by stating that you should not be worried if you do not understand quantum electrodynamics (QED), because he did not understand it and nor did anyone else!?
Theoretical physicists see this statement as testament to Feynman’s greatness whereas AIAS scientists see this as a clear admission that the standard model has spun itself a web of mathematical deceit which has captured the Copenhagenists in a Tholian Web from which they cannot extract themselves no matter how elaborate they make their mathematics.?
Standard modellists tell us that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is the most accurate theory ever thought up; and yet it can be shown that Planck’s constant that is used in their calculations is not known to anything like the accuracy required for producing their astonishingly accurate results. ?
?
?
?
?
Heisenberg transformed Schrödinger’s ground breaking equation into his mathematical matrix mechanics which lost its valuable connection to deterministic and real science.?
Mathematicians were thrilled because Heisenberg matrix mechanics could be used as a job creation scheme to keep them employed without the need to understand deterministic and real physics.?
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle was certainly not a principle of physics, but rather a con to confuse the world of science into funding physics which was not soundly based.?
The uncertainty principle was clearly wrong, because Compton had already shown that X-rays could be observed colliding with electrons and their paths could be observed before and after collision.?
Compton Received the Nobel Prize for physics for this work which clearly showed momentum is conserved in collisions between photons and electrons and that light as Einstein had claimed had mass.?
The conservation of momentum also showed that there was no uncertainty in the system at the atomic level as claimed by Heisenberg.?
The Copenhagenists and advocates of the standard model have conveniently forgotten Compton’s seminal experimental work and have conveniently been given substantial funding to pursue their quaint and idiosyncratic theories at the expense of the tax payer and real physicists! ?
?
?
?
?
Clearly then it can be seen that photons do indeed have mass. ?
Furthermore mass can be converted into light to give truly vast amounts of energy, which can be calculated by Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2.?
Likewise, light can be converted to mass. ?
?
?
?
?
The mass of an electron changing into energy according to the equation E = mc2, produces light of a wavelength and frequency corresponding to the X-ray region of the electromagnetic spectrum. ?
?
?
?
?
In the standard model of physics there exists the well known ‘Measurement Problem’.?
Theoretical physicists of the Copenhagen school believe wrongly that photons and electrons exist in a limbo state until observed and then turn into either a wave state or a particle state depending on the way the observation is conducted.?
This is the interpretation of wave particle duality that dates back to Bohr and Einstein. ?
Einstein would try to convince Bohr how ludicrous this interpretation was by asking, ‘Does that mean the Moon is not there when I am not looking at it!? ?
?
?
?
?
In chemistry and ECE theory, wave particle duality means that electrons have simultaneously a particle nature and a wave nature as first recognized by Prince Louis De Broglie.?
In high resolution electron microscopy, the wave nature of an electron is controlled by controlling the speed of the electron by accelerating it through the desired potential after it has been emitted from the electron gun at the top of the microscope. ?
As the electrons moves faster their wavelength shortens in a controllable way and after hitting the sample the electrons are diffracted and their exact position can be seen as a pattern on a fluorescent screen inside the microscope. ?
The diffraction pattern is ‘played with by tilting the sample in two directions in the beam until the diffraction pattern suddenly becomes fully illuminated. ?
When this occurs the atoms in the crystals are lined up in columns and the sample is face on.?
Now the electron lenses can be switched on and the lattice can be imaged directly and the position of the atoms in the unit cell of the crystal visualized directly! The required resolution for lattice imaging to be made possible is of the order of just over an angstrom and the wavelength of the electron beam is simply set by setting the voltage for the acceleration of electrons to the order of one hundred kilovolts.?
There is no uncertainty here of the type fantasized about by Heisenberg!?
The wavelength of the electrons is defined and the position of the collision in the sample is defined right down to the atomic level! ?
Kerry

This type of atom-seeing experiment described by Kerry here was first made on a Simens electron microscope in the new wing of the Edward Davies Chemical Laboratories at the then University College of Wales at Aberystwyth in Prof. Sir John Meurig Thomas’s group, of which Kerry was a member. Together with Prof Jose Croca’s group in the University of Lisboin, these data show that standard model indeterminacy is incorrect. So it is rejected in ECE theory, and was also rejected by Einstein, de Broglie, Vigier and others. The back up was by the late Jim Jenkins, who processed all the photographs, and by the glass blowing, mechanical and electronic workshops, notably the late Mr T. I. “Griff” Griffiths (Chief Technician), Mr Dyson Jones, Mr Irfon Williams, Mr John Poley, the late Mr Harold Jolley, and Mr Bob Meredith. The technical back-up for any research group is all important. The same team backed up my own research group of the seventies and early eighties (submillimetre laboratory, post graduate students and post doctoral fellows).

Civil List Scientist

Advertisements

%d bloggers like this: