Fwd: Relativity+



Subject: Re: Relativity+
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:34:08 EDT

The vacuum in ECE theory is defined very simply in accordance with Ockham’s Razor by the relation between the potential density of radiation and the Cartan tetrad:

A sup a sub mu = A(0) q sup a sub mu

where cA(0) is a voltage density observed in the radiative corrections (see for example ECE papers 85 by Horst Eckardt and myself). The only other hypothesis of ECE is that the angular energy momentum is proportional to the Cartan torsion through c / k. All of physics flows from these two hypotheses. The voltage density cA(0) is observable in teh g factor of the electron, the Lamb shift, the Casimir effect and other related effects of radiative corrections, and can be used for urgently needed new power through the use of spin connection resonance, a straightforward Euler Bernoulli resonance described in any good textbook. There are no strings in nature, no dark matter, no big bang, no black holes, and seemingly, no virtual particles of the Feynman or Dirac type. Paper 85 brings in to serious doubt the claims of QED to accuracy. QED is not a first principles theory, it just has adjustabel parameters given fancy names. The Einstein field equation is geometrically incorrect, and his ideas in special relativity are questionable. The metrics used in big bang and black hole theory are incorrect in several ways. From intense feedback interest in our sites (_www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and _www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com) ) we see that these avant garde ideas are being digested without hiccups by honest intellectuals who have the necessary technical ability to understand Cartan’s geometry. This is not really difficult. Even a chemist like myself can use it.


%d bloggers like this: