Fwd: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2

by

 



Subject: Fwd: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:31:47 EDT

Thanks to Gareth Evans. Our mutual Ph. D. supervisor Mansel Davies mentioned that it was the Nobel Laureate Peter Debye who said something like “complexity is lack of understanding”. This is another way of stating the mediaeval Ockham Razor of philosophy. Mansel wrote the official biography of Debye for the Faraday Society of which he was a committee member. It was later chartered and became the Royal Society of Chemistry. The latter nominated me for a Civil List Pension in 2004, awarded 2005.

These proofs are excellent !! Well done Myron, Horst (and Alex). Was it Hildebrand (or Debye) who said something along the lines, “If our understanding is not yet simple, it is not yet right……”?

These are elegant, bare bone proofs that reduce the subject to its simplest forms and demonstrate a new mastery of the issues involved. Physics is geometry once more replacing the meaningless symbolism and abstraction that has become the way of the Standard Model faction.

Best, Gareth

Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:04:06 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2

Many thanks! I like flow chart three very much, it should be clear to an O level pupil or even to the general reader with no training in mathematics that the connection is antisymmetric, it is like following signposts on the road. So anyone can now see that twentieth century gravitational physics was just empty dogma. It is pointless to set up wiki sites to attack the messenger, schoolchildren will see through it.

–Forwarded Message Attachment–

Subject: Fwd: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:38:40 -0400

Thanks Alex, this version is correct now. Dave, can you upload it to the web site?

Horst

—–Urspr?ngliche Mitteilung—– Von: Alex Hill An: horsteck] at [aol.com Verschickt: Mi., 25. Mrz. 2009, 4:06 Thema: Re: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2

Horst,

Here is the final pdf version which you should have received before. It seems the problem was that the Word version was OK, but I should have erased the old pdf version instead of asking the machine to overwrite it, so it overwrote it half way.

So now the old pdf version has been erased and the new one built from the new Word version.

I hope it carries no typos.

Regards,

Alex

— On Mon, 3/23/09, horsteck] at [aol.com wrote:

Subject: Re: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2

Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 4:57 AM

Hi Alex,

this is not the version I sent you: 1. The text at the beginning was changed 2. There is a part missing at the end of page 1, beginning of page 2: there must be 10 numbered equations plus an additional heading 3. The indices in eq. (3) for the R tensor are not correct: there must be a “nu” instead of the “rho” as the last lower index.

Thanks in advance for correction.

Horst

—–Urspr?ngliche Mitteilung—– Von: Alex Hill An: Horst Eckardt Verschickt: Mo., 23. Mrz. 2009, 2:59 Thema: Re: Proof 1, corrected version, part 2/2

Hello Horst,

I hope this version includes everything. I have added the flowcharts at the end.

Regards,

Alex

Die AOL Toolbar bietet Ihnen schnellen Zugriff auf Ihre Lieblings-Internetseiten und integrierte Google Websuche.

Die AOL Toolbar bietet Ihnen schnellen Zugriff auf Ihre Lieblings-Internetseiten und integrierte Google Websuche. _________________________________________________________________ View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place ? Learn more! http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/=

Advertisements

%d bloggers like this: