Fwd: Correct Physics



Subject: Correct Physics
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:42:56 EDT

This is now seen to be a succinct and accurate assessment of the state of establishment physics that is unacceptable to those who understand the situation for what it has, to a large extent, become – myth and nonsense (pseudo-science). It allows “science” that is inaccurate to be taught in our schools and colleges and wastes vast amounts of talent, resources and effort. The worst thing of all is that it holds back progress at a time when the world desperately needs new inventions, technologies, and industries. We may not be able to provide sufficient supplies of water and food for a vast, and growing, population on earth in the not too distant future unless we quickly develop new technologies that conserve essential natural balances.

The establishment must wake up to the reality of the situation and focus on the possible solutions that emerge from a new and correct physics. Best, Gareth

Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:40:19 -0400
Subject: Personal Wiki-List: What is Science and what is Pseudo-Science

There are well known philosophical rules governing what is science and what is pseudo-science. Notably the mediaeval Ockham Razor, which states that a theory must be as simple as possible, the idols of the cave philosophy of Francis Bacon, which states that a theory must be tested against experimental data, and thirdly that a theory must be mathematically correct. I would add that a theory of natural philosophy must produce observables that may be directly tested against data. The ECE theory is therefore scientific on all these well known grounds. The standard physics on the other hand is obsolete and incorrect. The so called “establishment” has been replaced spontaneously. If one wishes to draw up a wiki-list of pseudo-science then I would include the following.

1) The Einstein field equation is easily shown to be wildly incorrect.

2) So there was no big bang, no black holes, no Schwarzschild metric.

3) All metrics of the Einstein field equation are incorrect, with computer algebra this is easily shown to be the case now, whatever computer language one cares to implement. 4) There is no dark matter, this is an ad hoc unobservable. 5) There is no dark flow, and no dark universe. 6) The U(1) sector symmetry of electromagnetism is incorrect, as shown for example in notes 131, and on numerous other occasions. 6) The unobservables of physics include: any dimension higher than four, i.e. all string theory; teh Copenhagen indeterminacy, the Dirac sea; virtual particles; the internal spaces of gauge theory, dimensional regularization, spontaneous symmetry braking, the non-simply connected vacuum, the Higgs mechanism; confined quarks; supersymmetries; approximate symmetries and many other unobservables of the mathematical idol of the cave.

In addition the conduct of the pseudoscientifc establishment is such that it tries to cover up basic errors, and tries repeatedly to assert errors in new science when none exist. This intellectual dishonesty is widespread throughout the physics system and journal system and there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for it on http://www.aias.us alone. This is pseudo-science and at its worst, criminal conduct. It has been rejected by entire professions, judging by the feedback to the ECE sites.

Civil List Scientist

_________________________________________________________________ Share your photos with Windows Live Photos ? Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/=

I agree with Gareth of course, he was also a victim of the EDCL purges of the eighties, that episode illustrates ultimate uselessness.


%d bloggers like this: