Note 133(4) Reposting

Attempted reposting.

Consequences of Antisymmetry for the Riemann Curvature

The major consequence of the antisymmetry law is that only a few elements of the Riemann tensor can contribute and still obey antisymmetry, thus greatly simplifying its structure and making computation much easier. Similar results are obtained for the Cartan curvature form and Cartan torsion form. There is a temporary problem with the blog that started yesterday, in that attachments are not visible, this will be solved in due course. All advances are of course reported in full detail in the main www.aias.us site and also www.atomicprecision.com

133(5): Implications of Antisymmetry in Cartan’s Geometry

These are some major new results in Cartan geometry from the new antisymmetry laws. In vector notation the electric, magnetic, gravitational and gravitomagnetic fields are given in eqs. (34) to (40), with antisymmetry constraints. Doug Lindstrom has already found spin connection resonance from this structure. Similar results emerge in Riemann’s geometry. These are major advances in mathematics.

Papers 131 and 132 and Major Progress

These have been kindly typeset by Alex Hill and are beginning to be read now off www.aias.us. The abstract of paper 132 has been accepted for a forthcoming international conference and will appear in the conference volume. There has been a paradigm shift lately of great importance – one which occurs rarely in science. In papers 122 to 132 it has been shown in an astonishingly simple way that the basics of both the electromagnetic and gravitational sectors of the twentieth century idea of physics are thoroughly obsolete. readers are referred to the source papers and proofs one to five on the home page of www.aias.us. This major progress can be summarized in a nutshell as follows. 1) The Einstein field equation is obsolete and incorrect due to neglect of spacetime torsion. By now this is well known and accepted by objective readers without vested interest in standard model funding. 2) The U(1) sector symmetry of the standard electrodynamics is incompatible with the new and fundamental antisymmetry laws introduced in papers 131 and 132. 3) A successful unified field theory (Einstein Cartan Evans or ECE theory) has been accepted internationally and there is unprecedented international interest in it.

132(9): Spin Connection resonance for A = 0

This is given in eqs. (21) and (22) of the attached. So even in the complete absence of E and B spin connection resonance occurs on the ECE level, bit not on the U(1) level, where all fields vanish due to antisymmetry.

133(4): Notes by D. Lindstrom and M. W. Evans

These are notes on resonance by D. W. Lindstrom and M. W. Evans. In notes 132(9), eqs. (21) and (22), another mechanism of spin connection was suggested which is valid even for A = 0.

133(3): Antisymmetry with non zero A

The simple antisymmetry laws of papers 122 to 132 show that the magnetic field B vanishes on the U(1) level, a disaster for the standard model of physics. Normally, by U(1) dogma itself, the absence of a magnetic field means A = 0. However, this is another error of the standard model. The result should be curl A = 0, A zero or irrotational. If A is irrotational, an extra electric field enters at the ECE level as in eq. (49). and is denoted E sub A for each polarization a. Two examples of E sub A are given, a travelling wave of charge current density in a medium, and the Coulomb field. It is very important now to develop several subject areas with the very powerful antisymmetry laws.

a133rdpapernotes3.pdf

Coat of Arms being prepared by Valley Engraving (Clydach)

This is a proof of my coat of arms being prepared by Valley Engraving of Clydach in brushed stainless steel. It is quite an involved process involving five colours.

acoatofarmsredrawn.pdf

Productivity

It is well known that I have been vastly more productive and original than my contemporaries. This is due to discipline and application to work. Only by long and continuous practice does one attain a level of skill adn experience that makes genuine new discoveries. This productivity is due to personal hard work, not due to management of a large group. Although winning a record number of fellowships and producing a record number of papers, I was locked out of the so called University of Wales. So the latter ceases to have any respect because it still tries to say that it supports education. Inherent in human nature is a hypocrisy so deep that society no longer knows what the word means. So drastic reforms are urgently needed. This must come form the Welsh Assembly by law, because it is in charge of education in Wales. My academic contemporaries frequently tried to stop this productivity by pressurizing me to publish less and by eliminating lawful equal opportunity for many years continuously. This is illegal an should be tested in court I have tried finding their publication lists with an electron microscope. The only thing visible usually is a large pension. Impact measures are just not available for those contemporaries who tried so hard to stop the progress of science. They have no websites, no feedback data, no impact. The impact of a paper is measured in real time, not by citations, because citations are allowed only if the correct dogma is reiterated. I cannot see how people who just go from committee to committee every day can ever keep in practice and I see no point whatsoever in advocating incorrect science.

Lifting the Constraint A = 0

If B = 0 in paper 132 is taken to mean curl A = 0 and A not zero, then A must be irrotational. For example: A = A sub Z k so by antisymmetry: B = 0 E = – 2 partial phi / partial Z = – 2 partial A sub Z / partial t If A sub Z is static (no time dependence), then E is zero and phi does not depend on Z. In this case there is no E and no B on the U(1) level, even if it assumed that A is not zero. It is almost universally assumed in U(1) textbooks that when B is zero, A is zero. The above is the correct argument. If B is zero, A must be irrotational, and not necessarily zero. A static electric field in U(1) dogma is always written as – del phi, and there is no relation between del phi and partial A / partial t. A is almost always assumed to be zero.