Testing Wormhole Metrics against the Dual Identity

Subject: Testing Wormhole Metrics against the Dual Identity
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:34:53 EDT

We already know that the whole of this theory violates geometry, so is not scientific. For paper 120 we have already illustrated this with the Kruskal metric. For the same paper we can show that all wormhole metrics are also incorrect geometrically. I have found two examples which will suffice. The first example is:

F. Rahaman et al., gr-qc / 0611133v1 25 Nov 2006

This is a wormhole metric with varying cosmological constant. These are meaningless words, not science, I reproduce them only for the sake of reference. The metric is

ds squared = – exp gamma c squared dt squared + exp (mu) dr squared + r squared d omega squared

where

exp (- mu) = 1 – b(r) / r

Here gamma(r) / 2 is the red shift function and b(r) is a shape function, supposed to represent the shape of the wormhole. We will show that this metric is incorrect for all gamma and mu by running it through our code to show that it will again violate the dual identity of Cartan, again because of lack of torsion. I corresponded extensively with John Wheeler, who introduced the words “wormhole” and “black hole”. In both cases he was completely wrong as the computer now shows. The original idea goes back to the Einstein Rosen bridge, which is again erroneous, because it is based on the misnamed “Schwarzschild metric”. The latter is erroneous for several reasons.

So it is now known very clearly that there is a faction of pseudo-scientists who use TV as propaganda for rubbish – dry rot in science. These know very well that their theories are rubbish, but still tout them, completely unprofessional conduct.

I will give a second example in the next message.

Civil List Scientist