New Blog

The Atomic Precision blog is now live and being updated daily. Visit http://www.atomicprecision.com to see the latest news and catch up on the major new developments in unified field theory.

It’s been revamped and is being updated daily in 2014.

 

Unified Physics Institute of Technology

Check out the new Unified Physics Institute of Technology at http://www.upitec.org

Update on the Blog

Dr. Evans has established a new personal blog where he will continue to post as usual about topics of science, history, poetry and politics.

Please visit drmyronevans.wordpress.com to continue to follow him.

The New Potential Symmetry Relations.

 

Subject: 131(14): The New Symmetry Potential Symmetry Relations.
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:36:07 EDT

Attachment: a131stpapernotes14.pdf

These are given by eq. (1), and are of profound importance. They are easily proven as in eqs. (1) to (9) and in this note are used to refute the basic axiom of the standard model’s U(1) gauge theory of electromagnetism. This is what I did with B(3) theory at Cornell in 1991, published in Physica B in 1992. This work of mine has been recognized by other groups, internationally by unprecedented interest in ECE, and by two high honours of the British Government (2005 and 2008), and by the award of a TGA gold medal and prize in 2008. However, the discovery of eq. (1) is even more important because it pervades the whole of modern electrical engineering. This is just a simple U(1) level illustration, which I will shortly extend to the O(3) and ECE levels of classical electromagnetism. There is no way in which any unified field theory based on a U(1) sector symmetry can be anything except meaningless dogma, a paralysis of scientific thought.

Fwd: Paralysis of Thought by Dogma

 

Subject: Paralysis of Thought by Dogma
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 04:45:42 EDT

This is surely the way to summarize the late twentieth century in physics, after such a brilliant start in quantum mechanics by Einstein, Schroedinger and de Broglie. It is simple for anyone now to show the dogmatic nature of cosmology and electrodynamics in that obsolete dogma, it just cannot be called physics any longer. In the twentieth century, dogma became an industry, and a system of funding was established that was essentially self-perpetuating. So instead of just simply accepting the fact that the Einstein field equation has had its day, my guess is that the dogmatists will either try to ignore the huge amount of interest in ECE theory, or try to construct incomprehensible pseudo-mathematics with which to attack real mathematics that is obvious to all. The end result is a an almost unbelievable waste of public money and effort. It is time for responsible government to cut funding for obvious dogma, and redistribute it to chemistry and engineering. It is indeed frustrating to see science slipping back into the dark ages.

Fwd: Use of the Ockham Razor of Philosophy

 

Subject: Use of the Ockham Razor of Philosophy
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 04:15:10 EDT

The Ockham Razor of philosophy was proposed by the mediaeval scholar William of Ockham, who worked at Oxford and Paris before being exiled to the Court of Ludwig of Bavaria in Munich. He was falsely accused of “heresy”, a term which was used to get rid of anyone you didn’t agree with. I am familiar with this method myself. The proofs of points (1) and (2) of the previous message are so simple that questioning them raises eyebrows among genuine scholars and undergraduate students free of dogma. I am all in favour of freedom of thought, but this is the simplest of mathematics. For example proof one on the homepage of _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) .

Fwd: Lute Improvisations on a Theme of “Greensleves”

 

Subject: Lute Improvisations on a Theme of “Greensleves”
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:26:10 EDT

This is apparently how the lute was played, and it can be listened to on youtube. Henry VIII is said to have written “Greensleves”, and indeed is known to have been a capable lute player. His older brother Prince Arthur Tudor died in Ludlow Castle at the age of 15, probably of T.B., and his father, King Henry VII Tudor (Tewdwr), had him betrothed to Catherine of Aragon, as is well known. Catherine’s mother Isabella of Castile died shortly thereafter, so the betrothal was broken off, but after Henry Tudor died, Henry VIII decided himself to marry Catherine, for no reasons of kingship. Elizabeth was the daughter of Henry and Anne Boleyn, who was the Howard Duke of Norfolk’s niece. Contrary to popular perception, Henry remained a Catholic, and was never a Lutheran, or heretic as he would have called it. Elizabeth took a more tolerant view than her father, and did not come between a man and his conscience. The Lady Blanche Parry apparently taught Elizabeth the Welsh language, and although holding my rank, that of Gentlewoman, she was regarded as Baroness by the Queen. This is just the usual history concentrating on the aristocracy, of much greater interest is the history of the ordinary people, notably one Master William Shakespeare of Stratford upon Avon.

Fwd: John Dowland (1563 – 1626)

 

Subject: John Dowland (1563 – 1626)
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:42:00 EDT

There is a galliard by John Dowland on youtube, “The Frog Galliard”, and also “Sir John Smith – His Almain”. Sometimes at Tretower Court there are evenings of Tudor music and dance in traditional costume. Joan Havard was married into this Vaughan family in Tudor times as in Kerry’s excellent biography on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) . The Vaughans trace ancestry back to Sir Llewelyn Gam knighted on the field at Agincourt, and Tretower Court’s Norman part was originally built by Sir Miles Pickard, a fellow Norman knight of Sir Walter Havard, who was given the Lordship of Pontgwilym. Tretower Court is on google in all detail.

Fwd: Application of IFE

 

Subject: Fwd: Application of IFE
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:31:26 EDT

Seconded!

This is fantastic – well done Alex!!

Best, Gareth

Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:03:26 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Application of IFE

Excellent! Many thanks indeed. Only the dogs would resort to doubting the IFE. All one has to do is to google inverse Faraday effect.

–Forwarded Message Attachment–
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 12:01:22 -0700

Subject: Application of IFE

Dear Myron,

If there are still people who hold doubts about the existence and/or reproducibility of the Inverse Faraday Effect, they should visit our website and watch a recent video which we have uploaded in the Updates chapter, and in which we show a direct application of the IFE, proiduced by means of our special circuits.

Our website and updates chapter can be directly visited by clicking on:

http://www.et3m.net/Updates.html

I hope you find it of interest.

Regards,

Alex Hill _________________________________________________________________ Beyond Hotmail ? see what else you can do with Windows Live. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665375/direct/01/=

Fwd: Application of IFE

 

Subject: Fwd: Application of IFE
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:03:26 EDT

Excellent! Many thanks indeed. Only the dogs would resort to doubting the IFE. All one has to do is to google inverse Faraday effect.

Dear Myron,
If there are still people who hold doubts about the existence and/or reproducibility of the Inverse Faraday Effect, they should visit our website and watch a recent video which we have
uploaded in the Updates chapter, and in which we show a direct
application of the IFE, proiduced by means of our special circuits.
Our website and updates chapter can be directly visited by clicking on:
http://www.et3m.net/Updates.html
I hope you find it of interest.
Regards,
Alex Hill